What would you know about it? Managing ingroup vs. outgroup perceived support of same-sex vs. mixed-sex romantic relationships

• Published in: Journal of GLBT family studies Vol. 15; no. 5; pp. 429 - 441
• Main Authors: Blair, Karen L., Holmberg, Diane
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Routledge 20.10.2019
• Subjects: attributional ambiguity; ingroup; outgroup; same-sex relationships; social identity perspective; Social support for relationships
• ISSN: 1550-428X; 1550-4298
• DOI: 10.1080/1550428X.2018.1563760

Social support for relationships is an important predictor of relationship well-being, duration, and mental and physical health. But does the source of the support matter? This article examines whether there is potential moderation by the ingroup versus outgroup status of the person offering the support. Specifically, in a sample of 407 individuals in mixed-sex versus same-sex relationships, we assessed how much social support individuals perceived for their relationship from members of their social network who were queer versus straight. Those in same-sex relationships had significantly more queer members within their social networks than those in mixed-sex relationships (38.6% vs. 8.1%). We found that although those in both types of relationships perceived more support for their relationships from ingroup network members, only those in mixed-sex relationships demonstrated a stronger association between ingroup (straight) support and relationship well-being. Those in same-sex relationships showed relatively weak associations between network members' support for the relationship and their relationship well-being, regardless of source. Results are interpreted in light of the social identity perspective, and we also discuss the potential for attributional ambiguity and discounting of others' opinions about their relationships within the context of same-sex relationships.