Management of patients with cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia who have neither favorable nor unfavorable markers

The presence or absence of cytogenetic and molecular abnormalities present at the time of diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) not only provides important prognostic information, but also directs decisions regarding postremission therapy. In no other group has molecular analysis been more impor...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Vol. 12; no. 4; p. 527
Main Authors Walker, Alison R, Marcucci, Guido
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.04.2014
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The presence or absence of cytogenetic and molecular abnormalities present at the time of diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) not only provides important prognostic information, but also directs decisions regarding postremission therapy. In no other group has molecular analysis been more important than for the 40% to 50% of newly diagnosed patients in whom clonal chromosomal aberrations are not detected. Patients with cytogenetically normal (CN) AML were once considered a homogenous group, but are now classified into molecularly defined subgroups with distinct clinical outcomes. Evaluating FLT3, NPM1, and CEBPA mutational status is a routine component of the diagnostic evaluation for all patients with CN-AML and is used to determine outcome risk. However, in patients with FLT3 wild-type/NPM1 wild-type/CEBPA wild-type CN-AML, the optimal postremission therapy has not been well defined. This article reviews treatment outcomes for this group of patients after chemotherapy and autologous and allogeneic stem cell transplantation. New recurrent somatic mutations and their prognostic significance in patients with FLT3 wild-type/NPM1 wild-type CN-AML are also addressed.
ISSN:1540-1413
DOI:10.6004/jnccn.2014.0057