Locking plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures with impaction of the fracture site to restore medial column support: a biomechanical study

• Published in: Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery Vol. 22; no. 11; pp. 1552 - 1557
• Main Authors: Weeks, Colleen A., MD, Begum, Farhana, MSc, Beaupre, Lauren A., PhD, Carey, Jason P., PhD, Adeeb, Samer, PhD, Bouliane, Martin J., MD
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Mosby, Inc 01.11.2013
• Subjects: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; biomechanical; Biomechanical Phenomena; Bone Plates; Cadaver; complications; Female; fracture; Fracture Fixation, Internal - instrumentation; Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods; fracture impaction; Fractures, Comminuted - surgery; Humans; locking plate; Male; medial support; Middle Aged; Orthopedics; Proximal humerus; Shoulder Fractures - surgery; Biomechanics; locking plate; fracture impaction; Proximal humerus; biomechanical; complications; medial support; Basic science study; fracture
• ISSN: 1058-2746; 1532-6500
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.02.003

Background Despite the advent of locking plate techniques, proximal humeral fracture fixation can fail due to varus collapse, especially in osteoporotic bone with medial cortex comminution. This study investigated the effect of restoring the integrity of the medial column by fracture impaction and shaft medialization with locking plate fixation. This construct was compared with a traditional locking plate construct under conditions of varus cyclical loading. Materials and methods Proximal humeral fractures with medial comminution were simulated by performing wedge-shaped osteotomies at the surgical neck in cadaveric specimens and removing 1 cm of medial cortex. For each cadaver (n = 6), 1 humeral fracture was fixed with a traditional locking plate construct. The other was fixed with the locking plate construct plus fracture impaction and shaft medialization, resulting in medial column restoration. The humeral head was immobilized, and a repetitive, varus force was applied to the humeral shaft until construct collapse or until 25,000 cycles were completed. Results None of the constructs with fracture impaction collapsed, whereas 5 of 6 of the nonaugmented constructs collapsed before reaching 25,000 cycles ( P = .008). Collapse of the 5 nonimpacted constructs that failed occurred after an average of 11,470 ± 3589 cycles. Conclusion Fracture impaction increased the ability of the locking plate to withstand repetitive varus loading. This technique provides a construct biomechanically superior to locking plate fixation alone.