Numerical Simulation of the Burning Characteristics of Thermally-Thick Biomass Fuels in Packed-Beds

Biomass fuels are being increasingly used for domestic heating and power generation to cut down the net CO 2 emission to the atmosphere. In most cases, those fuels are thermally-thick under packed-bed combustion conditions. In this paper, a double-mesh numerical scheme is proposed and implemented to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inProcess safety and environmental protection Vol. 83; no. 6; pp. 549 - 558
Main Authors Yang, Y.B., Sharifi, V.N., Swithenbank, J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier B.V 01.11.2005
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Biomass fuels are being increasingly used for domestic heating and power generation to cut down the net CO 2 emission to the atmosphere. In most cases, those fuels are thermally-thick under packed-bed combustion conditions. In this paper, a double-mesh numerical scheme is proposed and implemented to simulate the detailed combustion processes for a biomass fuel with sizes ranging from 5 mm to 50 mm. Bench-top experiments were also carried out to validate the theoretical simulation. Under the specific conditions of investigation, it is found that a bed packed with particles over 35 mm can develop a temperature gradient over 400°C inside the particles at the flame front, and significant overlapping of moisture evaporation, devolatilization and char burn-out is observed in the bed-height direction; CH 4 emission over the bed top is more focused on the central part of the combustion period for larger particles; CO level in the flue gases increases with decreasing particle sizes and the opposite is true for H 2 emission. The overall air to fuel stoichiometric ratio for the whole combustion period increases significantly with increasing particle sizes, from 0.57 (fuel-rich) at 5 mm to 1.2 (fuel-lean) at 35 mm, but for the constant stage during combustion, the range of ratio narrows to 0.32–0.35.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0957-5820
1744-3598
DOI:10.1205/psep.04284