Incidence of arrhythmias in a large cohort of patients with current implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in Spain: results from the UMBRELLA Registry
The benefit of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) in patients at risk of sudden death has been established in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) using the ICD models available at the time. However, observational large-scale data on the incidence of arrhythmias in up-to-date ICDs implanted...
Saved in:
Published in | Europace (London, England) Vol. 18; no. 11; pp. 1726 - 1734 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
01.11.2016
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The benefit of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) in patients at risk of sudden death has been established in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) using the ICD models available at the time. However, observational large-scale data on the incidence of arrhythmias in up-to-date ICDs implanted according to the current guidelines are scarce. The aim was to assess the incidence of arrhythmias in a large, current ICD population based on a blinded peer review of the detected episodes.
UMBRELLA is a multicentre, observational registry of ICD patients followed by remote monitoring. Stored episodes were classified by a blinded committee of experts. Subgroup analyses were based on clinical profiles established by previous pivotal RCTs of ICDs. Of 1514 enrolled patients, 605 (39.9%) patients had 5951 episodes after 26 ± 17 months follow-up, being 3353 of them (56.3%) sustained ventricular arrhythmias (SVA), and 13.2% of SVA were self-terminated. Appropriate and inappropriate shocks occurred in 11.6 and 5% of patients, respectively. The 3 years cumulative incidence of SVA was 25% (95% CI: 21-28%) in primary prevention patients and 41% (95% CI: 36-47%) in secondary prevention patients (P < 0.001). Male gender, secondary prevention, and atrial fibrillation as basal rhythm were significantly related to a higher incidence of SVA.
This real-world analysis suggests that modern ICD patients have a low rate of appropriate and inappropriate shocks. The risk of SVA in secondary prevention patients is less than what has been reported in RCTs. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-3 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-2 |
ISSN: | 1099-5129 1532-2092 |
DOI: | 10.1093/europace/euv393 |