The ruse of consent and the anatomy of 'refusal': cases from indigenous North America and Australia
This article takes the notion of 'refusal' to be an alternative to recognition politics in settler colonial society. This is argued as alternative with recourse to ethnographic examples that highlight the way in which 'consent' operates as a technique of recognition and simultane...
Saved in:
Published in | Postcolonial studies Vol. 20; no. 1; pp. 18 - 33 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Abingdon
Routledge
02.01.2017
Taylor & Francis Ltd |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | This article takes the notion of 'refusal' to be an alternative to recognition politics in settler colonial society. This is argued as alternative with recourse to ethnographic examples that highlight the way in which 'consent' operates as a technique of recognition and simultaneous dispossession in historical cases from Indigenous North America and Australia. Attention is paid to the ways in which Indigenous life in these cases refused, did not consent to, and still refuses to be folded into a larger encompassing colonising and settler colonial narratives of acceptance, and in this, a governmental fait accompli. It is those narratives that inform the apprehension and at times, the ethnography and governance of Indigenous life and are pushed back upon in order to document, reread, theorise and enact ways out of the notion of a fixed past and settled present. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 |
ISSN: | 1368-8790 1466-1888 |
DOI: | 10.1080/13688790.2017.1334283 |