Brazilian foreign policy under Jair Bolsonaro: far-right populism and the rejection of the liberal international order

• Published in: Cambridge review of international affairs Vol. 35; no. 5; pp. 741 - 761
• Main Authors: Casarões, Guilherme Stolle Paixão e, Barros Leal Farias, Déborah
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Cambridge Routledge 17.11.2022; Taylor & Francis Ltd
• Subjects: Anti-communism; Aspiration; Bolsonaro, Jair; Communism; Ethnonationalism; Extremism; Foreign policy; Identity formation; Multilateralism; Nationalism; Policy making; Populism; Presidents; Radicalism; Regionalism; Religion; Right wing politics; Selfimage; Brazil; Latin America
• ISSN: 0955-7571; 1474-449X
• DOI: 10.1080/09557571.2021.1981248

This paper engages with debates over the Liberal International Order (LIO) and Latin America by focusing on Brazil. More specifically, it addresses President Jair Bolsonaro's foreign policy. His radical-right populist and religious-infused approach has been characterised by an explicit rejection of practically all elements of the LIO, including multilateralism, multiculturism, and regionalism-historically core features of Brazilian foreign policy. We seek to answer two interrelated questions: (1) what were the political conditions-domestic and international-that allowed for such dramatic foreign policy change? (2) what impact is Brazil's new foreign policy orientation having on the LIO? To address them, we resort to the aspirational constructivist theory, which has allowed us to theorise Brazil's new identity formation. We argue that Bolsonaro has reshaped Brazil's foreign policy as part of his endeavour to create a national self-image based on three pillars: anti-globalism, anti-Communism, and religious nationalism. By doing so, the Bolsonaro administration has transformed Brazil, otherwise an avid supporter of the LIO, into one of the order's most vocal critics. While anti-globalism (and, subsidiarily, anti-Communism) undermines the normative and institutional foundations of the LIO, religious nationalism offers a replacement to the order, based on independent ethno-nationalist communities. If Brazil's radical right populist model spreads across Latin America, it has the potential to hollow out the region's support to the LIO.