Audit Committees and Quarterly Earnings Management

Regulators have frequently expressed concerns about corporate earnings management. Audit committees are expected to monitor managers’ financial reporting, including attempts to manipulate earnings numbers. The extant literature has focused on managers’ incentives to manipulate annual earnings number...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of auditing Vol. 9; no. 3; pp. 201 - 219
Main Authors Yang, Joon S., Krishnan, Jagan
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK and Malden, USA Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.11.2005
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Regulators have frequently expressed concerns about corporate earnings management. Audit committees are expected to monitor managers’ financial reporting, including attempts to manipulate earnings numbers. The extant literature has focused on managers’ incentives to manipulate annual earnings numbers. However, managers also have incentives to manage quarterly earnings, due to, for example, pressures to meet quarterly analyst forecasts. We test the association between audit committee characteristics and measures of quarterly earnings management. Using a sample of 896 firm‐year observations for the years 1996–2000, we report three findings. First, quarterly earnings management is lower for firms whose audit committee directors have greater governance expertise. Second, the extent of stock ownership by audit committee directors is positively associated with quarterly earnings management. Third, the average tenure of audit committee directors is negatively associated with quarterly earnings management.
Bibliography:istex:0A0A41E9AEE7B9527A575C415E5781A5F33940EF
ark:/67375/WNG-68BC4123-V
ArticleID:IJA278
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:1090-6738
1099-1123
DOI:10.1111/j.1099-1123.2005.00278.x