The Circumpolar Arctic vegetation map

. Question: What are the major vegetation units in the Arctic, what is their composition, and how are they distributed among major bioclimate subzones and countries? Location: The Arctic tundra region, north of the tree line. Methods: A photo‐interpretive approach was used to delineate the vegetatio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of vegetation science Vol. 16; no. 3; pp. 267 - 282
Main Authors Walker, Donald A., Raynolds, Martha K., Daniëls, Fred J.A., Einarsson, Eythor, Elvebakk, Arve, Gould, William A., Katenin, Adrian E., Kholod, Sergei S., Markon, Carl J., Melnikov, Evgeny S., Moskalenko, Natalia G., Talbot, Stephen S., Yurtsev, Boris A.(†), The other members of the CAVM Team
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.06.2005
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1100-9233
1654-1103
DOI10.1111/j.1654-1103.2005.tb02365.x

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:. Question: What are the major vegetation units in the Arctic, what is their composition, and how are they distributed among major bioclimate subzones and countries? Location: The Arctic tundra region, north of the tree line. Methods: A photo‐interpretive approach was used to delineate the vegetation onto an Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) base image. Mapping experts within nine Arctic regions prepared draft maps using geographic information technology (ArcInfo) of their portion of the Arctic, and these were later synthesized to make the final map. Area analysis of the map was done according to bioclimate subzones, and country. The integrated mapping procedures resulted in other maps of vegetation, topography, soils, landscapes, lake cover, substrate pH, and above‐ground biomass. Results: The final map was published at 1:7 500 000 scale map. Within the Arctic (total area = 7.11 × 106 km2), about 5.05 × 106 km2 is vegetated. The remainder is ice covered. The map legend generally portrays the zonal vegetation within each map polygon. About 26% of the vegetated area is erect shrublands, 18% peaty graminoid tundras, 13% mountain complexes, 12% barrens, 11% mineral graminoid tundras, 11% prostrate‐shrub tundras, and 7% wetlands. Canada has by far the most terrain in the High Arctic mostly associated with abundant barren types and prostrate dwarf‐shrub tundra, whereas Russia has the largest area in the Low Arctic, predominantly low‐shrub tundra. Conclusions: The CAVM is the first vegetation map of an entire global biome at a comparable resolution. The consistent treatment of the vegetation across the circumpolar Arctic, abundant ancillary material, and digital database should promote the application to numerous land‐use, and climate‐change applications and will make updating the map relatively easy.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-3PM76S3X-F
istex:FBE5A447ED54F7A605A3C92CEFE00671180F4781
ArticleID:JVS2365
Supporting info itemSupporting info itemSupporting info item
N.G. Moskalenko, G.V. Ananjeva, D.S. Drozdov, L.A. Konchenko, Y.V. Korostelev, E.S. Melnikov, O.E. Ponomareva, (Earth Cryosphere Institute, Moscow Russia); A.E. Katenin, S.S. Kholod, N.V. Matveyeva, I.N. Safranova, R. Shelkunova, B.A. Yurtsev (deceased) (Komarov Botanical Institute, St. Petersburg, Russia; deceased); A.N. Polezhaev (Zonal Research Institute of NE Agriculture, Magadan Russia)
United States
Nomenclature
A.Elvebakk, B.E. Johansen (University of Tromsø, Norway)
Iceland
Russia
D.A. Walker, Project Director. The first named person for each of the following countries edited the map information for that country.
Canada
E. Einarsson, G. Gudjónsson (Icelandic Institute of Natural History, Reykjavik, Iceland)
W.A. Gould (International Institute for Tropical Forestry, San Juan, PR, USA); L.C. Bliss (University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA); S.A. Edlund (44 Emmerson Ave. #701; Ottawa, Canada); S.C. Zoltai (Northern Forestry Center, Edmonton, Alberta, deceased)
Norway
The CAVM Team
M.K. Raynolds, H.A. Maier, D.F. Murray, D.A. Walker, (University of Alaska Fairbanks, AK); M.D. Fleming (Images Unlimited, Anchorage, AK); C.J. Markon (USGS/EROS Alaska Field Office, Anchorage, AK); S.S. Talbot (US Fish & Wildlife Service, Anchorage AK); N.G. Trahan (Johnson Controls, Peoria IL); T.M. Charron, S.M. Lauritzen, and B.A. Vairin (USGS National Wetlands Research Center, Lafayette, LA).
US Department of Agriculture Plants Data‐base (USDA‐NRCS 2004)for all plant names. Nomenclature of syntaxa is in accordance with Weber (2000).
Greenland
F.J.A. Daniëls, M. Wilhelm (Institute of Plant Ecology, Münster, Germany); C. Bay (University of Copenhagen, Denmark)
ISSN:1100-9233
1654-1103
DOI:10.1111/j.1654-1103.2005.tb02365.x