Actuator-assisted Subpitch Translation-capable Transducer for Elastography: Preliminary Performance Assessment

• Published in: Ultrasonic imaging Vol. 42; no. 1; pp. 15 - 26
• Main Authors: Selladurai, Sathiyamoorthy, Thittai, Arun K.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 01.01.2020
• Subjects: actuator-assisted array; lateral resolution; elastography; spatial compounding; subpitch; rotation elastogram
• ISSN: 0161-7346; 1096-0910
• DOI: 10.1177/0161734619898806

In conventional linear array (CLA)–based elastography tissue compression in one direction (e.g., axial) leads to an expansion in all other directions (lateral, elevation). Therefore, the estimation of the lateral displacements and strains may provide additional information on the tissue mechanical properties. However, these are not exploited fully due to the inherent limitation in lateral sampling. Recently, a method named actuator-assisted beam translation (ABT) was demonstrated to address this issue, wherein the focused beam was translated at subpitch locations using an external bench-top setup. However, because such bench-top setup may be impractical for routine clinical use, an ultrasound transducer was customized to have an internal actuator. The performance of the customized transducer was studied through experiments on phantoms for rotation elastography application, which requires precise lateral displacement estimation. Furthermore, the results obtained from ABT was compared against the currently practiced spatial displacement compounding (SDC) method, which is known to yield better quality lateral displacement estimates than conventional approaches. The results show that the ABT method yields a full-width half-maximum (FWHM) value, taken from the lateral profile across a point scatterer, which is 65% and 24% smaller than that obtained using CLA and SDC methods, respectively. Furthermore, the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) estimated from rotation elastogram obtained using ABT method is better by 300% and 35% compared with that obtained by using CLA and SDC methods, respectively. Furthermore, the results demonstrate an additional advantage of having larger field of view (FoV) for the ABT method compared with spatial compounding approach.