Brazilian Thoracic Society recommendations for the diagnosis and monitoring of asbestos-exposed individuals

Asbestos was largely used in Brazil. It is a mineral that induces pleural and pulmonary fibrosis, and it is a potent carcinogen. Our objective was to develop recommendations for the performance of adequate imaging tests for screening asbestos-related diseases. We searched peer-reviewed publications,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJornal brasileiro de pneumologia Vol. 50; no. 3; p. e20240156
Main Authors Santos, Ubiratan Paula, Algranti, Eduardo, Capitani, Eduardo Mello De, Prado, Gustavo Faibischew, Carneiro, Ana Paula Scalia, Rodrigues, Sílvia Carla Sousa, Freitas, Jefferson Benedito Pires de, Chate, Rodrigo Caruso, Mizutani, Rafael Futoshi, Castro, Hermano Albuquerque de, Arbex, Marcos Abdo, Ribeiro, Patrícia Canto, Tietboehl Filho, Carlos Nunes, Castellano, Maria Vera Cruz de Oliveira, Leite, Guilherme Ward, Almeida, Gustavo Corrêa de
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Portuguese
Published Brazil Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia 2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Asbestos was largely used in Brazil. It is a mineral that induces pleural and pulmonary fibrosis, and it is a potent carcinogen. Our objective was to develop recommendations for the performance of adequate imaging tests for screening asbestos-related diseases. We searched peer-reviewed publications, national and international technical documents, and specialists' opinions on the theme. Based on that, the major recommendations are: Individuals exposed to asbestos at the workplace for ≥ 1 year or those with a history of environmental exposure for at least 5 years, all of those with a latency period > 20 years from the date of initial exposure, should initially undego HRCT of the chest for investigation. Individuals with pleural disease and/or asbestosis should be considered for regular lung cancer monitoring. Risk calculators should be adopted for lung cancer screening, with a risk estimate of 1.5%.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Instructional Material/Guideline-3
content type line 23
ISSN:1806-3756
1806-3756
DOI:10.36416/1806-3756/e20240156