Compressive mechanical behavior for surface auxetic structures

•The surface auxetic structures are designed by reversing and crimping the plane auxetic structure.•The theoretical equations of elastic deformation for representative auxetic cell structure are derived.•The designed reversing auxetic structures realize the supermechanical characteristics of compres...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of alloys and compounds Vol. 894; p. 162427
Main Authors Changfang, Zhao, Changlin, Zhao, Jianlin, Zhong, Hongwei, Zhu, Kebin, Zhang, Yangzuo, Liu
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Lausanne Elsevier B.V 15.02.2022
Elsevier BV
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•The surface auxetic structures are designed by reversing and crimping the plane auxetic structure.•The theoretical equations of elastic deformation for representative auxetic cell structure are derived.•The designed reversing auxetic structures realize the supermechanical characteristics of compression shrinkage and compression twist.•Compressive mechanical behavior and energy absorption effect of surface auxetic structures are obtained. Auxetic structure is a typical metamaterial, whose mechanical behaviors of two-dimensional and three-dimensional structures are widely studied. However, reports on surface auxetic structure (SAS) are rare. As a consequence, two types of SAS were designed by reversing and crimping the concave hexagonal plane auxetic structure (PAS) composed of double arrows, which were known as RAS and CAS, respectively. The theoretical equations to calculate the deformation of the representative volume cell structure (RVCS) were derived, and the relationships between energy and work were established based on the plastic wrinkle. The compressive simulations of the plane and surface auxetic structures were conducted through the use of finite element method (FEM) verified by experiment, and the mechanical behaviors and energy absorption characteristics were obtained. By comparing the simulation results of different structures, it was found that RAS not only realized the auxetic effect of compression shrinkage but also realized the supermechanical effect of compression twist. The auxetic effects of these structures were realized by the deformation of beams. The auxetic effect only appeared in the local positions of these structures, and other positions still belonged to the positive Poisson’s ratio effect. The crimped CAS had the biggest maximum load peak, and PAS possessed the highest specific energy absorption (SEA). The supermechanical effects of compression shrinkage and compression twist in RAS have great potential in some distinctive engineering applications.
ISSN:0925-8388
1873-4669
DOI:10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.162427