Papillary Thyroid Carcinomas with Tall Cell Features: An Intermediate Entity Between Classic and Tall Cell Subtypes

While the diagnosis of papillary thyroid carcinomas (PTCs) with tall cell features (PTCtcf) is often made for carcinomas with histological features intermediate between classic and tall cell subtypes of PTC (tcPTC), its comparative signature to that of either tcPTC or classic PTC is less clear. The...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThyroid (New York, N.Y.) Vol. 33; no. 6; p. 697
Main Authors Bikas, Athanasios, Wong, Kristine, Pappa, Theodora, Ahmadi, Sara, Wakefield, Craig B, Marqusee, Ellen, Xiang, Pingping, Altshuler, Benjamin, Haase, Jacob, Barletta, Justine A, Landa, Iñigo, Alexander, Erik K
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.06.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:While the diagnosis of papillary thyroid carcinomas (PTCs) with tall cell features (PTCtcf) is often made for carcinomas with histological features intermediate between classic and tall cell subtypes of PTC (tcPTC), its comparative signature to that of either tcPTC or classic PTC is less clear. The objective of this study was to perform an integrative clinicopathologic and genomic analysis elucidating the spectrum of tcPTC, PTCtcf, and classic PTC. We analyzed all consecutive patients with tcPTC and PTCtcf evaluated at a tertiary academic referral center between 2005 and 2020, as well as a comparative cohort of classic PTC, in a retrospective observational cohort analysis. Clinicopathologic data were compared among the three groups, including progression-free survival (PFS), recurrent/persistent disease, and a negative composite outcome of death, progression, or need for advanced therapy. To specifically understand differences between tcPTC and PTCtcf, targeted next-generation sequencing was performed in a subset of these cohorts. A total of 292 patients were analyzed (81 tcPTC, 65 PTCtcf, 146 classic PTC). Thirteen percent of tcPTC versus 8% of PTCtcf versus 1% of classic PTC had the advanced American Joint Committee on Cancer stage (  = 0.002). Similarly, macroscopic extrathyroidal extension was observed in 38% of tcPTC, 14% of PTCtcf, and 12% of classic PTC (  < 0.001). The 5-year PFS was 76.5%, 81.5%, and 88.3% for tcPTC, PTCtcf, and classic PTC, respectively, while the rates of the negative composite outcome 40.2% for tcPTC, 20.7% for PTCtcf, and 11.2% for classic PTC (  < 0.001). In a multivariable Cox regression analysis, the negative composite outcome was independently associated with tcPTC (HR 4.3 [confidence interval 1.1-16.1],  = 0.03). tcPTC demonstrated substantially more hotspot promoter mutations than PTCtcf (44% vs. 6%,  = 0.012). Our study demonstrates a continuum of disease-specific risk of PTC, pointing at PTCtcf as an intermediate entity between tcPTC and classic PTC. These data provide a more refined understanding of risk at time of presentation, while better elucidating the diversity of genomic drivers.
ISSN:1557-9077
DOI:10.1089/thy.2022.0534