Automation of Legal Precedents Retrieval: Findings from a Literature Review

Judges frequently rely their reasoning on precedents. Courts must preserve uniformity in decisions while, depending on the legal system, previous cases compel rulings. The search for methods to accurately identify similar previous cases is not new and has been a vital input, for example, to case-bas...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of intelligent systems Vol. 2023; pp. 1 - 22
Main Authors Mentzingen, Hugo, António, Nuno, Bacao, Fernando
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Hindawi 26.10.2023
Hindawi Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Judges frequently rely their reasoning on precedents. Courts must preserve uniformity in decisions while, depending on the legal system, previous cases compel rulings. The search for methods to accurately identify similar previous cases is not new and has been a vital input, for example, to case-based reasoning (CBR) methodologies. This literature review offers a comprehensive analysis of the advancements in automating the identification of legal precedents, primarily focusing on the paradigm shift from manual knowledge engineering to the incorporation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning (ML). While multiple approaches harnessing NLP and ML show promise, none has emerged as definitively superior, and further validation through statistically significant samples and expert-provided ground truth is imperative. Additionally, this review employs text-mining techniques to streamline the survey process, providing an accurate and holistic view of the current research landscape. By delineating extant research gaps and suggesting avenues for future exploration, this review serves as both a summation and a call for more targeted, empirical investigations.
ISSN:0884-8173
1098-111X
DOI:10.1155/2023/6660983