Foraging behavior of lacewing larvae (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) on plants with divergent architectures

We investigated the effects of plant architecture on predator-prey interactions by quantifying the behavior of green lacewing larvae on perennial grasses with divergent leaf architectures. Crested wheatgrass produces flat, broad leaves similar to those of wheat, whereas Indian ricegrass bears linear...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of insect behavior Vol. 11; no. 3; pp. 303 - 317
Main Authors Clark, T.L. (Utah State University, Logan, UT.), Messina, F.J
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Springer 01.05.1998
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We investigated the effects of plant architecture on predator-prey interactions by quantifying the behavior of green lacewing larvae on perennial grasses with divergent leaf architectures. Crested wheatgrass produces flat, broad leaves similar to those of wheat, whereas Indian ricegrass bears linear leaves that are tightly rolled inward. In the absence of prey, lacewing time budgets and residence times were similar on the two grasses, although predators tended to search longer on crested wheatgrass. On plants infested with the Russian wheat aphid, lacewing larvae dislodged, contacted, and captured significantly more aphids on Indian ricegrass than on crested wheatgrass. Comparisons between aphid-free and aphid-infested plants suggest that differences in plant architecture modified prey accessibility rather than predator movement. Aphids on seedlings and mature plants of crested wheatgrass frequently occurred in concealed locations, such as in the rolls of immature leaves or in the blade-sheath junctions of mature leaves; aphids on Indian ricegrass were more likely to feed in exposed locations. Our focal-animal observations were consistent with results from population-level experiments and suggest that short-term, behavioral studies may help predict the effectiveness of predators at larger spatial and temporal scales. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
Bibliography:F50
1997077787
H10
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0892-7553
1572-8889
DOI:10.1023/a:1020979112407