Using mouse tracking to investigate auditory taboo effects in first and second language speakers of American English

Researchers have argued that bilingual speakers experience less emotion in their second language. However, some studies have failed to find differences in emotionality between first and second language speakers. We used computer mouse tracking in an auditory lexical decision task to examine taboo ef...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCognition and emotion Vol. 34; no. 6; pp. 1291 - 1299
Main Authors Incera, Sara, Tuft, Samantha E, Fernandes, Rachel B, McLennan, Conor T
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Taylor & Francis Ltd 01.09.2020
Subjects
American English
Bilingual people
Bilingualism
Cognition
Cognitive ability
Decision making
Emotionality
Emotions
Female
Humans
Language
Language processing
Lexical decision task
Male
Mental task performance
Multilingualism
Reaction Time
Researchers
Second languages
Taboo
Taboo language
Taboos
Tracking
United States
User-Computer Interface
Words
Young Adult
United States
lexical decision
Emotion
second language
taboo effect
mouse tracking
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Researchers have argued that bilingual speakers experience less emotion in their second language. However, some studies have failed to find differences in emotionality between first and second language speakers. We used computer mouse tracking in an auditory lexical decision task to examine taboo effects - more efficient processing of taboo than neutral words - in first (L1) and second (L2) language speakers of American English. As predicted, we found an effect of language (L1 participants processed words more efficiently than L2 participants did) and a taboo effect (taboo words were processed more efficiently than neutral words). Interestingly, the language by taboo interaction (less emotionality in second language) emerged in number of errors and in the mouse trajectories, but it did not emerge in reaction times. We discuss how different aspects of participants' responses are likely to capture different underlying cognitive processes. We conclude, as other researchers have reported and many bilinguals experience, that language processing in second language is less emotional.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0269-9931
1464-0600
DOI:10.1080/02699931.2020.1741339