Effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation and monoclonal antibodies acting on the CGRP as a combined treatment for migraine (TACTIC): Results of a randomized controlled trial

Background Migraine pathogenesis involves both central and peripheral mechanisms. Although calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies have shown efficacy over placebo in migraine prevention, a proportion of individuals with migraine may experience a substantial residual burden while on tr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCephalalgia Vol. 45; no. 5; p. 3331024251325567
Main Authors Ornello, Raffaele, D’Atri, Aurora, De Icco, Roberto, De Santis, Federico, Rosignoli, Chiara, Onofri, Agnese, Vaghi, Gloria, Cammarota, Francescantonio, Brancaccio, Carla, Corrado, Michele, Bighiani, Federico, Grillo, Valentina, Sances, Grazia, Corigliano, Domenico, Salfi, Federico, Tassorelli, Cristina, Ferrara, Michele, Sacco, Simona
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London, England SAGE Publications 01.05.2025
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background Migraine pathogenesis involves both central and peripheral mechanisms. Although calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies have shown efficacy over placebo in migraine prevention, a proportion of individuals with migraine may experience a substantial residual burden while on treatment. Transcranial direct current stimulation is a non-invasive neuromodulation technique that can target central migraine mechanisms and may therefore complement calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies. The present study aimed to assess the efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation as an adjunctive treatment to calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies in migraine prevention and to investigate its neurophysiological effects. Methods This is a multicenter, randomized double-blind, sham-controlled, parallel-group trial including subjects with migraine on treatment with calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies for ≥90 days and with ≥8 monthly migraine days in the last 30 days. Subjects were randomized to active or sham transcranial direct current stimulation. The transcranial direct current stimulation protocol consisted of five daily 20-minute sessions of bilateral cathodal stimulation on the occipital area and anodal stimulation on the M1 area. High-density electroencephalographic recordings were performed before the first and after the last transcranial direct current stimulation session. The primary endpoint was the number of headache days during the 28-day follow-up period controlling for the 28-days baseline value. Secondary endpoints included the number of migraine days during the follow-up period, disability measures and electroencephalographic spectral power. The active and sham groups were compared using analysis of covariance. For clinical outcomes with significant differences between groups, we also ran paired t-tests comparing baseline and follow-up assessment within groups. Results Thirty participants were randomized (15 to active and 15 to sham group). Headache days during the 28-day follow-up period did not differ significantly between groups (p = 0.560, ηp2 = 0.017). However, participants receiving active transcranial direct current stimulation reported fewer migraine days during follow-up compared to the sham group (p = 0.008, ηp2 = 0.241). Paired t-tests indicated that the active tDCS group reported a reduction in migraine days during the follow-up period compared to baseline (t = 2.557, p = 0.023, Cohen's d = 0.660), while no difference was found in the sham group. Referring to neurophysiological endpoints, active transcranial direct current stimulation induced a significant decrease in delta power at frontal regions compared to sham. Conclusions This randomized-controlled trial suggests that transcranial direct current stimulation is a promising potentially effective treatment that may give additional benefits to subjects with migraine who are already on prevention with calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies but who have a substantial residual migraien burden. Combination treatments need to be better explored to provide strategies to further improve benefits of migraine prevention. Trial Registration : NCT05161871 (clinicaltrials.gov). Graphical abstract This is a visual representation of the abstract.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:0333-1024
1468-2982
1468-2982
DOI:10.1177/03331024251325567