An in vitro evaluation of two dentine adhesive systems to seal the pulp chamber using a glucose penetration model

To evaluate the sealing capability of Cavit™ G with or without Clearfil™ S3 Bond and Prime & Bond NT placed in the pulp chamber. Forty single rooted premolars, extracted for orthodontic and periodontal reasons, with intact coronal surface and mature apices, were standardized to a length of 15 mm...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMedicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal Vol. 16; no. 4; pp. e556 - e560
Main Authors González-Castillo, Silvia, Bailón-Sánchez, María-Estela, González-Rodríguez, María-Paloma, Poyatos-Martínez, Rafael, Ferrer-Luque, Carmen-María
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Spain 01.07.2011
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To evaluate the sealing capability of Cavit™ G with or without Clearfil™ S3 Bond and Prime & Bond NT placed in the pulp chamber. Forty single rooted premolars, extracted for orthodontic and periodontal reasons, with intact coronal surface and mature apices, were standardized to a length of 15 mm. The teeth were instrumented, filled with a gutta-percha master cone and divided into three groups to obturate the pulp chambers: Cavit™ G; Clearfil™ S3 Bond plus Cavit™ G and Prime & Bond® NT plus Cavit™ G. A glucose leakage model was used for evaluating the coronal microleakage. The Mann-Whitney test was used to evaluate the differences in the means of the glucose leakage. An increase in glucose penetration was observed during the first week in groups Cavit™ G and Cavit™ G+PBNT. The glucose penetration values of all groups were similar at 30 and 45 days, and there were no significant differences among them in both time periods (p=0.736 and p=0.581, respectively). The adhesive systems did not improve the capability of Cavit™ G to seal the pulp chamber over time.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1698-6946
1698-6946
DOI:10.4317/medoral.16.e556