Socioeconomic indicators for sustainable design and commercial development of algal biofuel systems

• Published in: Global change biology. Bioenergy Vol. 9; no. 6; pp. 1005 - 1023
• Main Authors: Efroymson, Rebecca A., Dale, Virginia H., Langholtz, Matthew H.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.06.2017
• Subjects: Agricultural land; Agronomy; Algae; algal biofuel; biodiesel; Biodiesel fuels; bioenergy; Biofuels; Biomass; Categories; Commercialization; Conservation; cyanobacteria; Design engineering; economic indicator; Economics; Energy conservation; Energy security; Environmental indicators; ethanol; Food; Food security; Food supply; Fuels; Indicators; Profitability; renewable diesel; Renewable energy; Resource conservation; Return on investment; Security; social indicator; Socioeconomics; Sustainability; Sustainable design; Sustainable development; Sustainable energy; Volatility
• ISSN: 1757-1693; 1757-1707
• DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12359

Social and economic indicators can be used to support design of sustainable energy systems. Indicators representing categories of social well‐being, energy security, external trade, profitability, resource conservation, and social acceptability have not yet been measured in published sustainability assessments for commercial algal biofuel facilities. We review socioeconomic indicators that have been modeled at the commercial scale or measured at the pilot or laboratory scale, as well as factors that affect them, and discuss additional indicators that should be measured during commercialization to form a more complete picture of socioeconomic sustainability of algal biofuels. Indicators estimated in the scientific literature include the profitability indicators, return on investment (ROI) and net present value (NPV), and the resource conservation indicator, fossil energy return on investment (EROI). These modeled indicators have clear sustainability targets and have been used to design sustainable algal biofuel systems. Factors affecting ROI, NPV, and EROI include infrastructure, process choices, and financial assumptions. The food security indicator, percent change in food price volatility, is probably zero where agricultural lands are not used for production of algae‐based biofuels; however, food‐related coproducts from algae could enhance food security. The energy security indicators energy security premium and fuel price volatility and external trade indicators terms of trade and trade volume cannot be projected into the future with accuracy prior to commercialization. Together with environmental sustainability indicators, the use of a suite of socioeconomic sustainability indicators should contribute to progress toward sustainability of algal biofuels.