Non‐reassuring fetal status and anesthetic impact on cesarean section‐delivered very‐low‐birthweight infants

Background There is limited evidence concerning the impact on neonatal outcomes of different types of anesthesia used for cesarean delivery due to non‐reassuring fetal status (NRFS). We aimed to assess the impact of NRFS and general anesthesia (GA) on neonatal outcomes in very‐low‐birthweight (VLBW)...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPediatrics international Vol. 64; no. 1; pp. e15308 - n/a
Main Authors Kim, Min Soo, Kim, HyoYun, Seo, Yumi, Yum, Sook Kyung
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Australia Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.01.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background There is limited evidence concerning the impact on neonatal outcomes of different types of anesthesia used for cesarean delivery due to non‐reassuring fetal status (NRFS). We aimed to assess the impact of NRFS and general anesthesia (GA) on neonatal outcomes in very‐low‐birthweight (VLBW) infants delivered by cesarean section. Methods Data were collected relating to VLBW infants admitted to our institution. Infants were grouped into no‐NRFS and NRFS groups and further subcategorized into GA and regional anesthesia (RA) subgroups. Neonatal outcomes were evaluated based on the presence of NRFS and the type of anesthesia. Results A total of 356 infants were included. The GA subgroup in the no‐NRFS group had higher requirements for respiratory support. However, GA was not associated with adverse neonatal outcomes based on the multivariable logistic regression analysis except for 5 min Apgar score <5. On the other hand, NRFS was associated with an increased risk of 5 min Apgar score <5 [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.062, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.064–3.997], use of high‐frequency ventilation (aOR: 2.891, 95% CI: 1.477–5.658), and pulmonary hypertension (aOR: 2.890, 95% CI: 1.436–5.819). Conclusions In our cohort of VLBW infants, NRFS was a significant risk factor for a low 5 min Apgar score, increased respiratory support requirement, and pulmonary hypertension. Accurate assessment of fetal well‐being, timely delivery, and presence of a resuscitation team fully aware of perinatal conditions and anesthetic impact is important.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1328-8067
1442-200X
DOI:10.1111/ped.15308