‘Going with the flow’ of dementia: A reply to Nigel Rapport on the social ethics of care

In this editors’ reply to Nigel Rapport's Afterword to the articles collected in the special issue ‘Moralities of care in later life’, we wonder: does the social ethics of care come with unacknowledged limits? We join with Rapport's call to maintain the individual's ‘personal preserve...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Australian journal of anthropology Vol. 29; no. 2; pp. 258 - 262
Main Authors Dawson, Andrew, Goodwin‐Hawkins, Bryonny
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.08.2018
Subjects
Anthropology
Biomedicine
care
Caregivers
Dementia
Ethics
Intergenerational relationships
Mining
Nigel Rapport
Personhood
Social responsibility
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:In this editors’ reply to Nigel Rapport's Afterword to the articles collected in the special issue ‘Moralities of care in later life’, we wonder: does the social ethics of care come with unacknowledged limits? We join with Rapport's call to maintain the individual's ‘personal preserve’ but observe—critically—that his “so far as possible, for as long as possible” makes for an uncomfortable caveat. To do so, we return ethnographically to the former mining town of Ashington, Northern England, and illustratively to a disease typically associated with the progressive loss of personhood: dementia. In contrast to both prevailing biomedical and person‐centred views of dementia, we adopt a radically relational approach, which in practice calls for attentiveness and opening oneself up on the part of the carer to the individual life‐world of another. Or, as it was for Ashington residents Eric and Elizabeth, a care‐full inter‐relationship re‐found in ‘going with the flow’.
ISSN:1035-8811
1757-6547
DOI:10.1111/taja.12286