Association of cardiovascular disease and urate levels with aortic aneurysm: a bilateral mendelian randomization study

The aim of this study is to investigate the potential causal relationships between coronary artery disease (CAD), myocardial infarction (MI), urate levels, and aortic aneurysm (AA), abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), thoracic aortic aneurysm(TAA), aortic dissection (AD) in individuals of European ance...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inScientific reports Vol. 14; no. 1; pp. 24070 - 13
Main Authors Xiao, Yuanyuan, Xiang, Tao
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London Nature Publishing Group UK 14.10.2024
Nature Publishing Group
Nature Portfolio
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The aim of this study is to investigate the potential causal relationships between coronary artery disease (CAD), myocardial infarction (MI), urate levels, and aortic aneurysm (AA), abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), thoracic aortic aneurysm(TAA), aortic dissection (AD) in individuals of European ancestry. To examine the potential causal relationships between CAD, MI, and urate levels with AA, AAA, TAA, AD, respectively, we performed a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis. Genetic instruments that reached genome-wide significance ( p  < 5 × 10 − 8) for risk factors were obtained from genome-wide association studies(GWASs) conducted on individuals of European origin. On the other hand, genetic instruments of AA, AAA, TAA or AD were chosen from the FinnGen cohort. The primary analysis employed the inverse-variance weighted MR method, while sensitivity analyses were conducted using MR-Egger, weighted median MR, MR pleiotropy residual sum and outlier, and Phenoscanner searching. In addition, we performed the MR-Egger intercept analysis to identify potential pleiotropy and utilized Cochran’s Q statistics to evaluate heterogeneity. Additionally, we conducted bidirectional Mendelian randomization experiments to mitigate the potential influence of reverse causation. According to the results of our study, there were statistically significant higher risks for AA in relation to CAD/MI(odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.309 (1.150–1.490), and 1.255 (1.147–1.373). Similarly, there were statistically significant higher risks for AAA in relation to CAD and MI (OR with 95% CI: 1.383 (1.189–1.609), and 1.352 (1.178–1.552). The sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the causative effects of CAD/MI, and AA /AAA, were robust. A positive causal link was observed between CAD/MI, and AA/AAA. Nevertheless, no causal link was found between CAD, MI, urate levels, and TAA .
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2045-2322
2045-2322
DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-75367-4