Giovanni Pontano hears the street soundscape of Naples

Giovanni Pontano’s dialogue Antonius can be read almost as a thick description of the soundscape of a Neapolitan street in the mid‐ to late‐15th century, complete with public announcements, street performers, domestic arguments, workers’ banter, charms and spells, processions, errand boys, bells, cl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inRenaissance studies Vol. 38; no. 4; pp. 519 - 540
Main Authors Shephard, Tim, Rice, Melany
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.09.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Giovanni Pontano’s dialogue Antonius can be read almost as a thick description of the soundscape of a Neapolitan street in the mid‐ to late‐15th century, complete with public announcements, street performers, domestic arguments, workers’ banter, charms and spells, processions, errand boys, bells, clocks, cockerels, and much more. Antonius was first printed in 1491, and then in a 1501 Opera edition alongside another dialogue, Charon, Pontano’s treatises De fortitudine, De principe and De obedientia, and his treatises on the “social virtues,” De liberalitate, De benificentia, De magnificentia, De splendore, and De conviventia. Using the street soundscape of Antonius as a framework, this essay interleaves both sonic reportage and reflections on the ethics and purpose of sound drawn from the other works included in the 1501 edition, to construct a rich and surprisingly detailed impression of the urban soundscape as it struck Pontano, or at least as he represented it in a literary context.
Bibliography:This study was completed within the project ‘Sounding the Bookshelf 1501: Music in a Year of Italian Printed Books’, funded by the Leverhulme Trust (RPG‐2020‐149). Melany Rice's involvement was facilitated by the Sheffield Undergraduate Research Experience scheme at the University of Sheffield. We are grateful to Alexandros Maria Hatzikiriakos, Elizabeth Elmi, and Giovanni Zanovello together with the participants in his graduate seminar at Indiana University, for their valuable comments on earlier drafts of this essay.
ISSN:0269-1213
1477-4658
DOI:10.1111/rest.12913