Machine learning innovations in address matching: A practical comparison of word2vec and CRFs

Record linkage is a frequent obstacle to unlocking the benefits of integrated (spatial) data sources. In the absence of unique identifiers to directly join records, practitioners often rely on text‐based approaches for resolving candidate pairs of records to a match. In geographic information scienc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inTransactions in GIS Vol. 23; no. 2; pp. 334 - 348
Main Authors Comber, Sam, Arribas‐Bel, Daniel
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.04.2019
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Record linkage is a frequent obstacle to unlocking the benefits of integrated (spatial) data sources. In the absence of unique identifiers to directly join records, practitioners often rely on text‐based approaches for resolving candidate pairs of records to a match. In geographic information science, spatial record linkage is a form of geocoding that pertains to the resolution of text‐based linkage between pairs of addresses into matches and non‐matches. These approaches link text‐based address sequences, integrating sources of data that would otherwise remain in isolation. While recent innovations in machine learning have been introduced in the wider record linkage literature, there is significant potential to apply machine learning to the address matching sub‐field of geographic information science. As a response, this paper introduces two recent developments in text‐based machine learning—conditional random fields and word2vec—that have not been applied to address matching, evaluating their comparative strengths and drawbacks.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1361-1682
1467-9671
DOI:10.1111/tgis.12522