Deconstructing the benefits of reading‐while‐listening on L2 reading comprehension: The influence of cross‐orthographic distance

• Published in: Foreign language annals Vol. 57; no. 1; pp. 163 - 183
• Main Author: Koh, Joanne
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Alexandria American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages 01.03.2024
• Subjects: Chinese as a second language; English as a second language; Grapheme phoneme correspondence; Graphemes; Korean language; L2 reading comprehension; Language; Linguistics; Listening; Listening comprehension; Literacy; Multiple choice; orthographic characteristics; Orthographic Symbols; Orthography; Pedagogy; Phonology; propositional comprehension; Reading comprehension; Reading Skills; reading‐while‐listening; Second language learning; Second language reading; Spanish as a second language; visual word recognition; Word recognition; Writing
• ISSN: 0015-718X; 1944-9720
• DOI: 10.1111/flan.12732

Reading‐while‐listening (RWL) has been suggested to facilitate reading comprehension by establishing letter‐to‐sound correspondences in the word recognition process. However, previous findings are inconsistent regarding the effect of RWL on foreign language (L2) reading comprehension. To understand why such inconsistency occurs, the moderating role of L2 orthographic characteristics in the effects of RWL on L2 propositional comprehension was examined. The orthographic characteristics of a language are of particular relevance as languages differ in the time course and the degree to which visual and phonological coding strategies are involved in word recognition. L1 Korean (alphabetic, shallow orthography) intermediate undergraduate learners of Chinese (nonalphabetic), English (alphabetic, deep orthography), and Spanish (alphabetic, shallow orthography) read and read‐while‐listened to authentic reading texts in their target language, and solved a set of written, untimed multiple‐choice questions to test their propositional comprehension. Results indicated that learners of an L2 with a larger distance (i.e., Chinese) from the L1 benefitted more from RWL, indicating that L2 orthographic characteristics interacted with input modality. Pedagogical implications for the use of RWL are discussed coupled with qualitative findings of students' perceptions. The Challenge The instructional practice of reading‐while‐listening (RWL) has been encouraged with a belief in its efficacy to promote L2 reading comprehension but previous research rendered mixed findings. How should then RWL be used? To understand why such inconsistency occurs and guide ways to use RWL in a more nuanced way, the present study deconstructs the nature of RWL by means of examining the moderating role of the cross‐linguistic orthographic distance between learners' L1 and L2.