The importance of including both sexes in preclinical sleep studies and analyses

• Published in: Scientific reports Vol. 14; no. 1; pp. 23622 - 15
• Main Authors: Mannino, Grant S., Green, Tabitha R. F., Murphy, Sean M., Donohue, Kevin D., Opp, Mark R., Rowe, Rachel K.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London Nature Publishing Group UK 15.10.2024; Nature Publishing Group; Nature Portfolio
• Subjects: 631/378; 631/443; Animal models; Animals; Eye movements; Female; Females; Gender differences; Humanities and Social Sciences; Male; Mice; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Mouse; multidisciplinary; Non-invasive; NREM sleep; REM sleep; Science; Science (multidisciplinary); Sex Characteristics; Sex differences; Sex Factors; Sexes; Sleep; Sleep - physiology; Sleep and wakefulness; Sleep, REM - physiology; Wakefulness - physiology; Female; Male; Sex differences; Sleep; Mouse; Non-invasive
• ISSN: 2045-2322; 2045-2322
• DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-70996-1

A significant effort in biomedical sciences has been made to examine relationships between sex and the mechanisms underlying various disease states and behaviors, including sleep. Here, we investigated biological sex differences in sleep using male and female C57BL/6J mice ( n  = 267). Physiological parameters were recorded for 48-h using non-invasive piezoelectric cages to determine total sleep, non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep, rapid eye movement (REM)-like sleep, and wakefulness (WAKE). We fit hierarchical generalized linear mixed models with nonlinear time effects and found substantial sex differences in sleep. Female mice slept less overall, with less NREM sleep compared to males. Females also exhibited more REM-like sleep and WAKE and had shorter NREM sleep bout lengths. We also conducted a simulation exercise where we simulated a hypothetical treatment that altered the sleep of female mice, but not male mice. In models that included an appropriate sex by treatment interaction, a female-specific treatment response was accurately estimated when sample sizes were equal but was not detected when sample sizes were unequal, and females were underrepresented. Failure to include both sexes in experimental designs or appropriately account for sex during analysis could lead to inaccurate translational recommendations in pre-clinical sleep studies.