The impact of COVID-19 on a college freshman sample reveals genetic and nongenetic forms of susceptibility and resilience to stress

Using a longitudinal approach, we sought to define the interplay between genetic and nongenetic factors in shaping vulnerability or resilience to COVID-19 pandemic stress, as indexed by the emergence of symptoms of depression and/or anxiety. University of Michigan freshmen were characterized at base...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 120; no. 49; p. e2305779120
Main Authors Turner, Cortney A., Khalil, Huzefa, Murphy-Weinberg, Virginia, Hagenauer, Megan H., Gates, Linda, Tang, Yu, Weinberg, Lauren, Grysko, Robert, Floran-Garduno, Leonor, Dokas, Thomas, Samaniego, Catherine, Zhao, Zhuo, Fang, Yu, Sen, Srijan, Lopez, Juan F., Watson, Stanley J., Akil, Huda
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States National Academy of Sciences 05.12.2023
SeriesThe Neurobiology of Stress: Vulnerability, Resilience, and Major Depression
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Using a longitudinal approach, we sought to define the interplay between genetic and nongenetic factors in shaping vulnerability or resilience to COVID-19 pandemic stress, as indexed by the emergence of symptoms of depression and/or anxiety. University of Michigan freshmen were characterized at baseline using multiple psychological instruments. Subjects were genotyped, and a polygenic risk score for depression (MDD-PRS) was calculated. Daily physical activity and sleep were captured. Subjects were sampled at multiple time points throughout the freshman year on clinical rating scales, including GAD-7 and PHQ-9 for anxiety and depression, respectively. Two cohorts (2019 to 2021) were compared to a pre-COVID-19 cohort to assess the impact of the pandemic. Across cohorts, 26 to 40% of freshmen developed symptoms of anxiety or depression (N = 331). Depression symptoms significantly increased in the pandemic years and became more chronic, especially in females. Physical activity was reduced, and sleep was increased by the pandemic, and this correlated with the emergence of mood symptoms. While low MDD-PRS predicted lower risk for depression during a typical freshman year, this genetic advantage vanished during the pandemic. Indeed, females with lower genetic risk accounted for the majority of the pandemic-induced rise in depression. We developed a model that explained approximately half of the variance in follow-up depression scores based on psychological trait and state characteristics at baseline and contributed to resilience in genetically vulnerable subjects. We discuss the concept of multiple types of resilience, and the interplay between genetic, sex, and psychological factors in shaping the affective response to different types of stressors.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
Edited by Eric J. Nestler, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; received May 12, 2023; accepted August 3, 2023 by Editorial Board Member Susan G. Amara
1C.A.T. and H.K. contributed equally to this work.
ISSN:0027-8424
1091-6490
1091-6490
DOI:10.1073/pnas.2305779120