The nature of analogue-based free thyroxine estimates

• Published in: Thyroid (New York, N.Y.) Vol. 14; no. 12; p. 1030
• Main Authors: Nelson, Jerald C, Wang, Rong, Asher, David T, Wilcox, R Bruce
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01.12.2004
• Subjects: Humans; Prealbumin; Protein Binding; Radioimmunoassay; Serum Albumin; Solutions; Thyroxine - analogs & derivatives; Thyroxine - analysis; Thyroxine-Binding Proteins - chemistry
• ISSN: 1050-7256
• DOI: 10.1089/thy.2004.14.1030

Clinical laboratories often use analogue-based immunoassays to estimate serum free thyroxine (FT(4)) concentrations. These assays yield FT(4) estimates that correlate closely with thyroxine (T(4)) binding protein concentrations. This correlation implies that either T(4) binding proteins or protein bound T(4) contribute to analogue-based FT(4) values. To study the contributions made by T(4) binding proteins to these FT(4) estimates further, four analogue-based FT(4) assays were applied to: (1) FT(4) solutions without T(4) binding proteins, (2) to T(4) binding protein solutions without T(4), and (3) to total T(4) solutions containing T(4) binding protein, FT(4), and protein-bound T(4). The FT(4) estimates obtained with these solutions ranged from 0.2-8.6 ng/dL, when FT(4) concentrations ranged from less than 0.2-12,000 ng/dL. In the FT(4) solutions, gravimetrically determined FT(4) concentrations were 500-12,000 ng/dL (0.5-12.0 microg/dL) without protein-bound T(4), and the FT(4) estimates obtained were 0.3-6.9 ng/dL. In the total T(4) solutions, dialyzable FT(4) concentrations were less than 0.2-59 ng/dL, retained T(4) concentrations were 499.8-11,441 ng/dL, and the analogue-based FT(4) estimates obtained were 0.2-8.6 ng/dL. Similar FT(4) estimates (0.2-8.6 ng/dL and 0.3-6.9 ng/dL) were obtained with similar concentrations of either protein-bound T(4) or FT(4). Similar test results were associated with similar total T(4) concentrations, not similar FT(4) concentrations. Protein-bound T(4) and T(4) binding protein contributed variably to test results. T(4) quantifications included large analytical losses that are unaccounted for. These assays passed tests of correlation with FT(4) concentrations, but they failed tests of specificity for FT(4) and accuracy in T(4) quantification.