Morphology of homo-epitaxial vicinal (1 0 0) III–V surfaces

Vicinal substrates are widely used to fabricate semiconductor devices. The different surface step types and their density have a strong influence on the surface structure. We have systematically studied this misorientation dependence on the morphology of (1 0 0)InP as a function of growth conditions...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of crystal growth Vol. 200; no. 1; pp. 19 - 31
Main Authors Verschuren, C.A., Leys, M.R., Rongen, R.T.H., Vonk, H., Wolter, J.H.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Amsterdam Elsevier B.V 01.04.1999
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Vicinal substrates are widely used to fabricate semiconductor devices. The different surface step types and their density have a strong influence on the surface structure. We have systematically studied this misorientation dependence on the morphology of (1 0 0)InP as a function of growth conditions in chemical beam epitaxy. On substrates containing no steps or only A-type steps we observe mirror-like surfaces, but many characteristic defects are always present. The defect density is successfully reduced by the introduction of B-type steps. When a sufficient density of only B steps is present, the surface is very smooth with almost no defects. Near any B “step up” edge, however, a ripple pattern is formed, which extends over tens of microns in the B step propagation direction. For substrates with mixed steps the ripple pattern is more pronounced and significant surface roughening occurs. Here, we present and discuss a general model for the morphology of (2×4) reconstructed vicinal (1 0 0) III–V surfaces. It gives a complete and quantitative description of these observations, including the dependence on growth conditions and thus provides a useful tool to study and optimize the growth process.
ISSN:0022-0248
1873-5002
DOI:10.1016/S0022-0248(98)01412-2