Reduction leaching of rare earth from ion-adsorption type rare earths ore with ferrous sulfate
The practice ofin-situ leaching of the ion-adsorption type rare earths ore with ammonium sulfate could only leach most of rare earth in ion-exchangeable phase, but not the colloidal sediment phase. Therefore, the reduction leaching of rare earth from the ion-adsorption type rare earths ore with ferr...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of rare earths Vol. 34; no. 9; pp. 917 - 923 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Elsevier B.V
01.09.2016
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The practice ofin-situ leaching of the ion-adsorption type rare earths ore with ammonium sulfate could only leach most of rare earth in ion-exchangeable phase, but not the colloidal sediment phase. Therefore, the reduction leaching of rare earth from the ion-adsorption type rare earths ore with ferrous sulfate was innovatively put forward. The soak leaching process and the column leaching process were investigated in the present study. It was determined that ion-exchangeable phase could be released, and part of colloidal sediment phase rare earth could be reduction leached by the cations with reduction properties. The mechanism of reduction leaching was discussed with the Eh-pH diagram of cerium. Moreover, the stronger reduction of reductive ions, the greater acidity of leaching agent solution, and the higher reductive ion concentration, could result in the higher rare earth efficiency and the bigger ce-rium partition in the leaching liquor. In the ferrous sulfate column leaching process, the rare earth leaching rate and the rare earth effi-ciency were a little higher than with (NH4)2SO4 agent, and the rare earth efficiency and the partitioning of cerium in leaching liquor could be about 102% and 5.31%, respectively. However, the ferrous sulfate leaching process revealed some problems, so compound leaching with magnesium sulfate and a small amount of ferrous sulfate was proposed to an excellent alternative leaching agent for further studies, which may realize efficiency extraction and be environment-friendly. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | rare earth; reduction leaching; ferrous sulfate; the ion-adsorption type rare earths ore 11-2788/TF The practice ofin-situ leaching of the ion-adsorption type rare earths ore with ammonium sulfate could only leach most of rare earth in ion-exchangeable phase, but not the colloidal sediment phase. Therefore, the reduction leaching of rare earth from the ion-adsorption type rare earths ore with ferrous sulfate was innovatively put forward. The soak leaching process and the column leaching process were investigated in the present study. It was determined that ion-exchangeable phase could be released, and part of colloidal sediment phase rare earth could be reduction leached by the cations with reduction properties. The mechanism of reduction leaching was discussed with the Eh-pH diagram of cerium. Moreover, the stronger reduction of reductive ions, the greater acidity of leaching agent solution, and the higher reductive ion concentration, could result in the higher rare earth efficiency and the bigger ce-rium partition in the leaching liquor. In the ferrous sulfate column leaching process, the rare earth leaching rate and the rare earth effi-ciency were a little higher than with (NH4)2SO4 agent, and the rare earth efficiency and the partitioning of cerium in leaching liquor could be about 102% and 5.31%, respectively. However, the ferrous sulfate leaching process revealed some problems, so compound leaching with magnesium sulfate and a small amount of ferrous sulfate was proposed to an excellent alternative leaching agent for further studies, which may realize efficiency extraction and be environment-friendly. XIAO Yanfei , FENG Zongyu , HU Guhua , HUANG Li HUANG Xiaowei , CHEN Yingying , LONG Zhiqi (1. National Engineering Research Center for Rare Earth Materials, General Research Institute for Nonferrous Metals, Beijing 100088, China; 2. Grirem Ad- vanced Materials Co., Ltd., Beijing 100088, China; 3. School of Metallurgy and Chemical Engineering, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Ganzhou 341000, China; 4. Chalco Guangxi Nonferrous Rare Earth Development Co., Ltd., Nanning 530000, China; 5. School of Chemical Engineering, China Univer- sity of Petroleum, Beijing 102200, China) |
ISSN: | 1002-0721 2509-4963 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S1002-0721(16)60115-1 |