Parent-Child Relationship in the Civil Code of China

• Published in: Laws Vol. 12; no. 1; p. 1
• Main Author: You, Wenting
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel MDPI AG 01.12.2022
• Subjects: adoption; Children; denial of legitimate children; Families & family life; Family law; Guardians; Human rights; Inheritance and succession; Jurisprudence; Kinship; Laws, regulations and rules; Legal status; Legislation; Marriage; marriage and family law; Parent and child; Parent-child relations; parent-child relationship; Parents & parenting; Paternity; Personal relationships; presumption; private law; Rules; China
• ISSN: 2075-471X; 2075-471X
• DOI: 10.3390/laws12010001

The purpose of this article is to familiarize readers with the Chinese Civil Code, which entered into force in early 2021, and to draw their attention to the changes brought about by the Marriage and Family Book, which is now included in Volume V of the new code. The paternity system best reflects the changes in the Chinese Marriage and Family Book, especially Article 1073. A complete paternity system includes presumption, claim, and denial of the parent-child relationship. However, Article 1073 of the Civil Code, which regulates the parent-child relationship, is a guiding provision with a lack of operational rules. It is necessary to make general rules for operation and enforcement by adding supporting rules, including the presumption of legitimate children, the claim of children born out of wedlock, the denial of legitimate children, and other operational rules, to resolve paternity disputes. The Civil Code also makes changes to the adoption system in the Marriage and Family Book, mainly by further restricting the conditions for adopters with the aim of protecting the interests of the adoptee children. Although the Chinese Civil Code retains the concepts of legitimate and illegitimate children, in essence, there is no difference in their rights and legal status, including the right to inheritance. In conclusion, the legislative norms of paternity determination improve the Chinese paternity system, but lack operability, and it is important to accumulate experience through practice and draw on custom and jurisprudence to develop specific operational rules that complement the legislative provisions. This is exactly what this paper will address and the knowledge gap it will fill.