Assessing the accuracy of volume averaging effective diffusivity estimates with Brownian dynamics simulations

The volume averaging method (VAM) is widely used for estimating the effective diffusivity for solute transport in constrained geometries (e.g., porous media). Comparisons with experimental results for different geometric configurations have indicated that the VAM can provide accurate results over a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inChemical engineering science Vol. 75; pp. 418 - 423
Main Authors Aguilar-Madera, C.G., Valdes-Parada, F.J., Dagdug, L., Alvarez-Ramirez, J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Kidlington Elsevier Ltd 18.06.2012
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The volume averaging method (VAM) is widely used for estimating the effective diffusivity for solute transport in constrained geometries (e.g., porous media). Comparisons with experimental results for different geometric configurations have indicated that the VAM can provide accurate results over a wide range of porous media configurations. This work uses Brownian dynamics simulations (BDS) to estimate effective diffusivities for constrained geometries and to assess the accuracy of estimations from the VAM. For simple microscale geometric configurations, both isotropic and non-isotropic, it was found that the results predictions of effective diffusivity from VAM agree well with results from the BDS for high porosity values. However, some discrepancies are found for low porosity values, which were attributed to a smoothing effect of the VAM closure problem in the vicinity of very small apertures. ► Effective diffusivity estimates from Brownian dynamics simulation. ► Good agreement with estimates from the method of volume averaging. ► Important deviations in the low porosity range.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2012.04.008
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0009-2509
1873-4405
DOI:10.1016/j.ces.2012.04.008