Pain associated with cemented and uncemented long-stemmed tibial components in revision total knee arthroplasty

AIMSStemmed tibial components are frequently used in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to evaluate patient satisfaction, overall pain, and diaphyseal tibial pain in patients who underwent revision TKA with cemented or uncemented stemmed tibial components. METHODST...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe bone & joint journal Vol. 103-B; no. 6 Supple A; pp. 165 - 170
Main Authors Larson, Darin J., Rosenberg, John H., Lawlor, Maxwell A., Garvin, Kevin L., Hartman, Curtis W., Lyden, Elizabeth, Konigsberg, Beau S.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 01.06.2021
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:AIMSStemmed tibial components are frequently used in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to evaluate patient satisfaction, overall pain, and diaphyseal tibial pain in patients who underwent revision TKA with cemented or uncemented stemmed tibial components. METHODSThis is a retrospective cohort study involving 110 patients with revision TKA with cemented versus uncemented stemmed tibial components. Patients who underwent revision TKA with stemmed tibial components over a 15-year period at a single institution with at least two-year follow-up were assessed. Pain was evaluated through postal surveys. There were 63 patients with cemented tibial stems and 47 with uncemented stems. Radiographs and Knee Society Scores were used to evaluate for objective findings associated with pain or patient dissatisfaction. Postal surveys were analyzed using Fisher's exact test and the independent-samples t-test. Logistic regression was used to adjust for age, sex, and preoperative bone loss. RESULTSNo statistically significant differences in stem length, operative side, or indications for revision were found between the two cohorts. Tibial pain at the end of the stem was present in 25.3% (16/63) of cemented stems and 25.5% (12/47) of uncemented stems (p = 1.000); 74.6% (47/63) of cemented patients and 78.7% (37/47) of uncemented patients were satisfied following revision TKA (p = 0.657). CONCLUSIONThere were no differences in patient satisfaction, overall pain, and diaphyseal tibial pain in cemented and uncemented stemmed tibial components in revision TKA. Patient factors, rather than implant selection and surgical technique, likely play a large role in the presence of postoperative pain. Stemmed tibial components have been shown to be a possible source of pain in revision TKA. There is no difference in patient satisfaction or postoperative pain with cemented or uncemented stemmed tibial components in revision TKA. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(6 Supple A):165-170.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2049-4394
2049-4408
DOI:10.1302/0301-620X.103B6.BJJ-2020-2439.R2