Diallel analysis of fruit water absorption in tomato, a contributing factor in postharvest decays

• Published in: Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science Vol. 133; no. 1; pp. 55 - 60
• Main Authors: Smith, S.M, Scott, J.W, Bartz, J.A, Sargent, S.A
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: 2008
• Subjects: absorption; ambient temperature; cultivars; cytoplasmic inheritance; diallel analysis; general combining ability; genetic variation; genotype; hybrids; inbred lines; maternal effect; plant breeding; postharvest diseases; postharvest physiology; seasonal variation; Solanum lycopersicum var. lycopersicum; specific combining ability; spoilage; tomatoes; vegetable crops; water; water content
• ISSN: 0003-1062; 2327-9788
• DOI: 10.21273/jashs.133.1.55

Harvested tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum L.) fruit can absorb water via stem scar tissues. Decay incidence {bacterial soft rot ( Erwinia carotovora Jones), sour rot ( Geotrichum candidum Link), bacterial sour rot [ Leuconostoc mesenteroides (Tsenkovskii) van Tieghem ssp. mesenteroides ], and certain species of Lactobacillus Beijerinck} has been positively linked with the degree of water absorption. Previous studies have shown that cultivars differ in their tendencies to take up water during a simulation of packinghouse handling procedures. The inheritance of water absorption tendency was examined in two seasons of tests where six inbred tomato lines were intercrossed to develop a complete diallel. Following harvest at the mature-green stage, fruit were weighed, submerged in water for 2 min, and then reweighed to determine water absorption. Parental lines were tested in three seasons. Two parental lines, Fla. 7776 and Fla. 7946, were always in the low-absorption grouping, and NC84173 also had relatively low absorption. Fla. 8059 and Fla. 7777 were always in the high-absorption group, and Fla. 8000 tended to have high absorption. General combining ability for the low water absorption fruit characteristic was significant for both seasons with a higher level of significance in the spring over the fall season ( P ≤ 0.001 and P ≤ 0.05, respectively), while specific combining ability was not significant for either season. Thus, the low water absorption fruit characteristic appears to be additively inherited. Accurate knowledge of parental absorption should allow prediction of hybrid performance. None of the hybrids absorbed unexpected amounts of water over both seasons. Reciprocal effects were significant ( P ≤ 0.05) for fall, and maternal effects were significant ( P ≤ 0.05) in spring. However, there was no general trend in water absorption due to the direction of the cross and thus no clear evidence for cytoplasmic inheritance. Water absorption was much greater in spring than in fall. Based on previous observations, the greater absorption in spring was due to higher field temperatures. Because of such environmental effects, parent lines should be replicated and tested over several seasons to accurately assess their relative water absorption. Crosses between consistently low water absorption parents should provide low-absorption hybrids, but testing of hybrids before release is suggested to verify this.