Studies and comparison of the liquid adsorption behavior and surface properties of single- and multiwall carbon nanotubes by capillary rise method

[Display omitted] ► SWCNT adsorbed polar liquid greatly, MWCNT adsorbed non-polar liquid greatly. ► The surface energy of both SWCNTs and MWCNTs dominated by the LW interactions component. ► SWCNT strongly the Lewis base, MWCNT strongly the Lewis acid. The liquid adsorption behaviors and surface pro...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inColloids and surfaces. A, Physicochemical and engineering aspects Vol. 415; pp. 86 - 90
Main Authors Mezgebe, Mebrahtu, Jiang, Lin-Hai, Shen, Qing, Du, Cong, Yu, Hao-Ran
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier B.V 05.12.2012
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:[Display omitted] ► SWCNT adsorbed polar liquid greatly, MWCNT adsorbed non-polar liquid greatly. ► The surface energy of both SWCNTs and MWCNTs dominated by the LW interactions component. ► SWCNT strongly the Lewis base, MWCNT strongly the Lewis acid. The liquid adsorption behaviors and surface properties of single- (SWCNT) and multiwall (MWCNT) carbon nanotubes were studied and compared by the capillary rise method. It was found that these CNTs both adsorbed the diiodomethane greatly as compared with other liquids, e.g. water, formamide and hexane, and the reason is due to the total surface free energy of these CNTs both dominated by the Lifshitz–van der Waals interactions component, especially the SWCNTs at about 95%. Comparison further indicated that the SWCNT adsorbed the polar liquid greatly due to stronger in the Lewis base component and the MWCNT adsorbed the non-polar liquid greatly due to stronger in the Lewis acid component. The total surface free energy of SWCNT is about 50mN/m slight greater than that of the MWCNT.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2012.09.046
ISSN:0927-7757
1873-4359
DOI:10.1016/j.colsurfa.2012.09.046