Online training on how to diagnose anoperineal lesions of Crohn's disease: Do pictures matter? A nationwide randomized study

Any gastroenterologist must be trained to properly diagnose anoperineal lesions in patients with Crohn's disease (APLOC). The aim of this study was to establish whether adding pictures would improve teaching effectiveness of the diagnosis of APLOC to French gastroenterology trainees. Trainees w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inClinics and research in hepatology and gastroenterology Vol. 43; no. 4; pp. 483 - 496
Main Authors Geffrier, C, de Parades, V, Abramowitz, L, Benfredj, P, Bonnaud, G, Bord, C, Bouchard, D, Bouguen, G, Devulder, F, Didelot, J M, Fathallah, N, Higuero, T, Lesage, X, Nouts, A, Petit, P, Pigot, F, Pommaret, E, Roumeguere, P, Siproudhis, L, Staumont, G, Zeitoun, J D, Marteau, P
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published France Elsevier 01.08.2019
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Any gastroenterologist must be trained to properly diagnose anoperineal lesions in patients with Crohn's disease (APLOC). The aim of this study was to establish whether adding pictures would improve teaching effectiveness of the diagnosis of APLOC to French gastroenterology trainees. Trainees were asked to answer a first web-based survey consisting of evaluating 12 pictures of APLOC with a closed answer questionnaire. They were then randomized in 2 groups. Group A received an online teaching with typical pictures and APLOC definitions and group B definitions only. Trainees were asked again seven days later to answer a second survey with 12 other pictures of APLOC and 14 experts also answered this survey. Diagnostic scores were expressed in %. The primary endpoint was the comparison of the score of survey 2 between the two groups of trainees. Secondary endpoints were to compare results of survey 2 between trainees of both groups and experts, and assess diagnosis of each lesion. Two hundred fourty eight trainees among 465 answered survey 1, and 195 survey 2. The diagnostic score was 71.9% for groups A and B and 74.6% for experts (differences NS). After training diagnosis of ulceration was 72% for group A and 72.9% for group B, fistulae 85.2% versus 85.8%, erythema 44.1% vs. 55.6%, anoperineal scars 67.5% vs. 65.6%, and abscess 100% (differences NS). There was no difference between the two teaching methods. Further research should be performed aiming at improving teaching material and quotation baremes.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-News-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ISSN:2210-7401
2210-741X
DOI:10.1016/j.clinre.2018.12.003