Treating isopropyl alcohol by a regenerative catalytic oxidizer

• Published in: Separation and purification technology Vol. 62; no. 1; pp. 71 - 78
• Main Authors: Lou, Jie-Chung, Huang, Shih-Wei
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Amsterdam Elsevier B.V 01.08.2008; Elsevier Science
• Subjects: Applied sciences; Catalysis; Catalyst; Catalytic reactions; Chemical engineering; Chemistry; Exact sciences and technology; General and physical chemistry; Hydrodynamics of contact apparatus; Isopropyl alcohol; Reactors; Regenerative catalytic oxidizer; Theory of reactions, general kinetics. Catalysis. Nomenclature, chemical documentation, computer chemistry; Thermal recovery efficiency; Isopropyl alcohol; Thermal recovery efficiency; Regenerative catalytic oxidizer; Catalyst; Catalytic reaction; Stability; Carbon dioxide; Hydrodynamics; Volatile organic compound; Impregnation; Honeycomb structure; Loading; Heating; Pressure drop; Fuel; Oxidation; Ceramic materials
• ISSN: 1383-5866; 1873-3794
• DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2007.12.024

Regenerative catalytic oxidizer (RCO) can be conveniently used to control emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), because of their thermal recovery efficiency (TRE), low fuel cost and high oxidation. In this work, catalysts with various metal weight loadings were prepared by deposition–precipitation, wet impregnation and incipient impregnation to treat isopropyl alcohol (IPA). We used the excellent catalytic performance in a pilot RCO to test IPA oxidation performance under various conditions. The best catalyst was selected and its TRE, bed temperature variations, pressure drops and selectivity of the catalyst were more widely discussed. The results demonstrate that the optimal catalyst was prepared by wet impregnation with 20 wt.% metal on ceramic honeycomb (CH). 20 wt.% Cu–Co/(CH) catalyst was the best catalyst used in a RCO because it was effective in treating IPA, with a CO 2 yield of up to 95% at a heating zone temperature ( T set) = 400 °C under various conditions. It also had the largest tolerance of variations in inlet IPA concentration and gas velocity ( U g). This 20 wt.% Cu–Co/(CH) catalyst in a RCO performed well in terms of TRE, pressure drop and selectivity to CO 2. The TRE range in a RCO was from 87.8 to 91.2% under various conditions, and decreased as U g increased in a fixed T set. The pressure drop increased with U g and T set. The selectivity to CO 2 increased to over 95% at 300 °C, and that to propene remained at 2–5% from 200 to 400 °C. Finally, the stability test results indicated that the 20 wt.% Cu–Co/(CH) catalyst was very stable at various CO 2 yields and temperatures.