Perceiving the Affordance of Contact in Fourand Five-Month-Old Infants

The focus of this study was on the ability of infants to perceive whether an object is positioned at a distance that would make contact possible. As a toy was presented, sometimes within and sometimes beyond reach, the initiation of reaching and leaning forward was scored. Infants were divided into...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inChild development Vol. 64; no. 1; pp. 298 - 308
Main Authors Yonas, Albert, Hartman, Brenda
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.02.1993
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The focus of this study was on the ability of infants to perceive whether an object is positioned at a distance that would make contact possible. As a toy was presented, sometimes within and sometimes beyond reach, the initiation of reaching and leaning forward was scored. Infants were divided into leaning and nonleaning groups. Both leaning and nonleaning 5‐month‐olds changed their behavior dramatically when the object was placed beyond, as opposed to within, reach. The nonleaners showed a decline in reaching when this boundary for contact was crossed. The “leaners” did not; rather, they began to lean forward. These results suggest that 5‐month‐olds use information for the affordance of contact. 4‐month‐olds provided less evidence that arm length regulates reaching. 5‐month‐old infants acted as if they not only had some sensitivity to the absolute distance of an object but also to the effect that leaning forward has on their ability to make contact with a distant object.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-5NR5L4TK-C
istex:6AC8D35036F1896A5B542FE3504693F2E6ADFA09
ArticleID:CDEV298
A preliminary report of this research was presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society in Seattle, WA, 1987. Support for this research was provided by a grant from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD‐16924). The authors thank Ann Sorknes Bensen and Rebecca Swendiman for help in the collection and scoring of the data, and Susan Phipps‐Yonas and Ann Sorknes for helpful comments on an earlier draft of the paper.
ISSN:0009-3920
1467-8624
DOI:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1993.tb02911.x