All-or-none disconnection of pyramidal inputs onto parvalbumin-positive interneurons gates ocular dominance plasticity
Disinhibition is an obligatory initial step in the remodeling of cortical circuits by sensory experience. Our investigation on disinhibitory mechanisms in the classical model of ocular dominance plasticity uncovered an unexpected form of experience-dependent circuit plasticity. In the layer 2/3 of m...
Saved in:
Published in | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 118; no. 37 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
National Academy of Sciences
14.09.2021
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Disinhibition is an obligatory initial step in the remodeling of cortical circuits by sensory experience. Our investigation on disinhibitory mechanisms in the classical model of ocular dominance plasticity uncovered an unexpected form of experience-dependent circuit plasticity. In the layer 2/3 of mouse visual cortex, monocular deprivation triggers a complete, "all-or-none," elimination of connections from pyramidal cells onto nearby parvalbumin-positive interneurons (Pyr→PV). This binary form of circuit plasticity is unique, as it is transient, local, and discrete. It lasts only 1 d, and it does not manifest as widespread changes in synaptic strength; rather, only about half of local connections are lost, and the remaining ones are not affected in strength. Mechanistically, the deprivation-induced loss of Pyr→PV is contingent on a reduction of the protein neuropentraxin2. Functionally, the loss of Pyr→PV is absolutely necessary for ocular dominance plasticity, a canonical model of deprivation-induced model of cortical remodeling. We surmise, therefore, that this all-or-none loss of local Pyr→PV circuitry gates experience-dependent cortical plasticity. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 Edited by Carla J. Shatz, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, and approved August 7, 2021 (received for review March 22, 2021) 1D.S., S.Z.H., and S.-E.R. contributed equally to this work. Author contributions: D.S., S.Z.H., S.-E.R., J.Z., M.C.D.B., I.H., S.M., S.R., R.P.H., E.M.Q., P.W., and A.K. designed research; D.S., S.Z.H., S.-E.R., S.H., J.Z., M.C.D.B., I.H., S.M., S.R., and R.P.H. performed research; R.L.H. and M.G. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; D.S., S.Z.H., S.-E.R., S.H., M.C.D.B., I.H., S.M., S.R., R.P.H., and E.M.Q. analyzed data; S.H. made the initial discovery; and D.S., E.M.Q., P.W., and A.K. wrote the paper. |
ISSN: | 0027-8424 1091-6490 |
DOI: | 10.1073/pnas.2105388118 |