Principal component analysis for fast and model-free denoising of multi b-value diffusion-weighted MR images

Despite the utility of tumour characterisation using quantitative parameter maps from multi-b-value diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI), clinicians often prefer the use of the image with highest diffusion-weighting (b-value), for instance for defining regions of interest (ROIs). However, these images are t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPhysics in medicine & biology Vol. 64; no. 10; pp. 105015 - 105028
Main Authors Gurney-Champion, Oliver J, Collins, David J, Wetscherek, Andreas, Rata, Mihaela, Klaassen, Remy, van Laarhoven, Hanneke W M, Harrington, Kevin J, Oelfke, Uwe, Orton, Matthew R
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published IOP Publishing 16.05.2019
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Despite the utility of tumour characterisation using quantitative parameter maps from multi-b-value diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI), clinicians often prefer the use of the image with highest diffusion-weighting (b-value), for instance for defining regions of interest (ROIs). However, these images are typically degraded by noise, as they do not utilize the information from the full acquisition. We present a principal component analysis (PCA) approach for model-free denoising of DWI data. PCA-denoising was compared to synthetic MRI, where a diffusion model is fitted for each voxel and a denoised image at a given b-value is generated from the model fit. A quantitative comparison of systematic and random errors was performed on data simulated using several diffusion models (mono-exponential, bi-exponential, stretched-exponential and kurtosis). A qualitative visual comparison was also performed for in vivo images in six healthy volunteers and three pancreatic cancer patients. In simulations, the reduction in random errors from PCA-denoising was substantial (up to 55%) and similar to synthetic MRI (up to 53%). Model-based synthetic MRI denoising resulted in substantial (up to 29% of signal) systematic errors, whereas PCA-denoising was able to denoise without introducing systematic errors (less than 2%). In vivo, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and sharpness of PCA-denoised images were superior to synthetic MRI, resulting in clearer tumour boundaries. In the presence of motion, PCA-denoising did not cause image blurring, unlike image averaging or synthetic MRI. Multi-b-value MRI can be denoised model-free with our PCA-denoising strategy that reduces noise to a level similar to synthetic MRI, but without introducing systematic errors associated with the synthetic MRI method.
Bibliography:Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine
PMB-108204.R1
ISSN:0031-9155
1361-6560
DOI:10.1088/1361-6560/ab1786