Are Theories of Imagery Theories of Imagination? An Active Perception Approach to Conscious Mental Content

Can theories of mental imagery, conscious mental contents, developed within cognitive science throw light on the obscure (but culturally very significant) concept of imagination? Three extant views of mental imagery are considered: quasi‐pictorial, description, and perceptual activity theories. The...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCognitive science Vol. 23; no. 2; pp. 207 - 245
Main Author Thomas, Nigel J.T.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 10 Industrial Avenue, Mahwah, NJ 07430‐2262, USA Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc 01.04.1999
Taylor & Francis
Ablex Pub. Corp
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Can theories of mental imagery, conscious mental contents, developed within cognitive science throw light on the obscure (but culturally very significant) concept of imagination? Three extant views of mental imagery are considered: quasi‐pictorial, description, and perceptual activity theories. The first two face serious theoretical and empirical difficulties. The third is (for historically contingent reasons) little known, theoretically underdeveloped, and empirically untried, but has real explanatory potential. It rejects the “traditional” symbolic computational view of mental contents, but is compatible with recent situated cognition and active vision approaches in robotics. This theory is developed and elucidated. Three related key aspects of imagination (non‐discursiveness, creativity, and seeing as) raise difficulties for the other theories. Perceptual activity theory presents imagery as non‐discursive and relates it closely to seeing as. It is thus well placed to be the basis for a general theory of imagination and its role in creative thought.
ISSN:0364-0213
1551-6709
DOI:10.1207/s15516709cog2302_3