Evaluating perspectives on well-being and burnout among emergency medicine program leaders

Comparisons were made using chi-square (categorical variables) and analysis of variance (continuous variables) statistical tests. 174 individuals completed the survey (Table 1) including resident program directors (n = 70, 40.2%) with greater than four years of experience (n = 66, 37.9%), and from a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe American journal of emergency medicine Vol. 77; pp. 223 - 225
Main Authors Agarwal, Anish K., Barrett, John R., Gonzales, Rachel, Deutsch, Amanda J., Scott, Kevin R.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.03.2024
Elsevier Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Comparisons were made using chi-square (categorical variables) and analysis of variance (continuous variables) statistical tests. 174 individuals completed the survey (Table 1) including resident program directors (n = 70, 40.2%) with greater than four years of experience (n = 66, 37.9%), and from academic health systems (n = 86, 44.3%). There were no program level characteristics associated with burnout (e.g., type of program, region, size of educational leadership team, presence of fellows). Participant Program Degree (n = 174) MD 141 81.0% Program Type (n = 162) Community 48 24.7% DO 30 17.2% Urban 24 12.4% Other 3 1.7% Academic 86 44.3% Age (n = 174) 31–40 79 45.4% Academic-Affiliate 29 14.9% 41–50 65 37.4% Other 7 3.6% 51–50 27 15.5% Region (n = 162) Northeast 57 35.2% 61+ 3 1.7% Southwest 44 27.2% Number of Dependents (n = 174) 0 45 25.9% Great Lakes 22 13.6% 1 22 12.6% Plains 12 7.4% 2 62 35.6% Rocky Mountains 1 0.6% 3 26 14.9% Southwest 9 5.6% > 3 19 10.9% West 17 10.5% Academic Rank (n = 173) Instructor 8 4.6% Number of Chief Residents (n = 161) 0 to 2 39 24.2% Assistant Professor 88 50.9% 3 to 4 110 68.3% Associate Professor 57 32.9% > 4 12 7.5% Professor 15 8.7% Educational Fellows (n = 161) Yes 62 38.5% Other 5 2.9% No 99 61.5% Role (n = 174) Program Director 70 40.2% Number of APDs (n = 162) 0 to 1 31 19.1% Associate Program Director 49 28.2% 2 to 3 95 58.6% Assistant Program Director 36 20.7% 4 to 6 36 22.2% Other 19 10.9% Number of program coordinators align with recommendations? (n = 161) Yes, exceeds 45 28.0% Holds other roles (n = 174) Yes 99 56.9% Yes, aligns 88 54.7% No 75 43.1% No 17 10.6% Years in Role (n = 174) 0 to 1 26 14.9% Unsure 11 6.8% 1 to 2 28 16.1% Number of Core Faculty (n = 156); Mean (SD) 13.42 (7.6) 3 to 4 54 31.0% Number of Program Coordinators (n = 162); Mean (SD) 1.74 (2.8) > 4 66 37.9% Number of Residents (n = 148); Mean (SD) 37.54 (15.4) Table 1 Participant and program demographics.
Bibliography:content type line 23
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Correspondence-1
ISSN:0735-6757
1532-8171
1532-8171
DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2023.12.035