An examination of the inmate code in Canadian penitentiaries

Scholars researching the development and adoption of an inmate code in penitentiaries have agreed on its basic elements and the influence of the prison environment on its adoption. Yet, the changing climate in Canadian penitentiaries and the fact that the inmate code has yet to be studied in a Canad...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of crime & justice Vol. 37; no. 2; pp. 234 - 255
Main Author Ricciardelli, Rose
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Abingdon Routledge 04.05.2014
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Scholars researching the development and adoption of an inmate code in penitentiaries have agreed on its basic elements and the influence of the prison environment on its adoption. Yet, the changing climate in Canadian penitentiaries and the fact that the inmate code has yet to be studied in a Canadian context remain of concern. Thus, this study seeks to empirically document current elements of the inmate code in Canadian federal prisons in Ontario and theoretically explain why this code is adopted by prisoners in these penitentiaries. In light of researchers noting the impact of risk, including its assessment and management, on behaviors, I argue that risk - defined here as concern for safety - and unsafe prison environments have reshaped the code. Drawing on data collected from interviews with 56 ex-prisoners, I propose that the inmate code in Ontario penitentiaries is composed of five primary tenets: (1) 'never rat on a con' and don't get friendly with the staff; (2) be dependable (not loyal); (3) follow daily behavior rules or else; (4) I won't see you, don't see me, and shut up already; and (5) be fearless or at least act tough. A portrayal of the current unsafe and high risk nature of Canadian penitentiary environments in Ontario and its implications for the prisoners in residence is also provided. Findings are discussed within a risk context with an emphasis on empirical and theoretical implications.
ISSN:0735-648X
2158-9119
DOI:10.1080/0735648X.2012.746012