Eight good questions for developmental epistemology and psychology

My reply to eight good questions arising from commentary is an elaboration of my main argument that there are parallels in the epistemologies of Frege and Piaget and that these parallels have distinctive implications for developmental psychology. The eight questions are: (i) was Piaget really an epi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNew ideas in psychology Vol. 17; no. 2; pp. 137 - 147
Main Author Smith, Leslie
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Elsevier Ltd 1999
Pergamon Press
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0732-118X
1873-3522
DOI10.1016/S0732-118X(99)00016-1

Cover

More Information
Summary:My reply to eight good questions arising from commentary is an elaboration of my main argument that there are parallels in the epistemologies of Frege and Piaget and that these parallels have distinctive implications for developmental psychology. The eight questions are: (i) was Piaget really an epistemologist? (ii) is Piaget's epistemic subject psychological or epistemological? (iii) is Frege's non-modal logic consistent with Piaget's account of necessity? (iv) does Piaget's constructivism entail realism? (v) what is the relation between thinking and thought? (vi) is Frege's concept of mind too narrow? (vii) how are cause and reason related in the interpretation of thought? (viii) what is the status of an act of judgment in the interpretation of thought? These questions are productive, and can be developed.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0732-118X
1873-3522
DOI:10.1016/S0732-118X(99)00016-1