Wait-freedom with advice

We motivate and propose a new way of thinking about failure detectors which allows us to define what it means to solve a distributed task wait-free using a failure detector . In our model, the system is composed of computation processes that obtain inputs and are supposed to produce outputs and sync...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inDistributed computing Vol. 28; no. 1; pp. 3 - 19
Main Authors Delporte-Gallet, Carole, Fauconnier, Hugues, Gafni, Eli, Kuznetsov, Petr
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.02.2015
Springer Nature B.V
Springer Verlag
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We motivate and propose a new way of thinking about failure detectors which allows us to define what it means to solve a distributed task wait-free using a failure detector . In our model, the system is composed of computation processes that obtain inputs and are supposed to produce outputs and synchronization processes that are subject to failures and can query a failure detector. Under the condition that correct (never failing) synchronization processes take sufficiently many steps, they provide the computation processes with enough advice to solve the given task wait-free: every computation process outputs in a finite number of its own steps, regardless of the behavior of other computation processes. Every task can thus be characterized by the weakest failure detector that allows for solving it, and we show that every such failure detector captures a form of set agreement. We then obtain a complete classification of tasks, including ones that evaded comprehensible characterization so far, such as renaming or weak symmetry breaking.
Bibliography:SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0178-2770
1432-0452
DOI:10.1007/s00446-014-0231-6