Mode I type delamination fracture toughness of YBCO coated conductor with additional Cu layer

► A fracture toughness test method was developed for a YBCO coated conductor with an additional Cu layer. ► Mode I type tests were carried out using double cantilever beam (DCB) specimens. ► Delamination propagated into the YBCO layer, and sometimes reached the Ag/YBCO interface. ► The fracture toug...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPhysica. C, Superconductivity Vol. 471; no. 21-22; pp. 1071 - 1074
Main Authors Miyazato, T., Hojo, M., Sugano, M., Adachi, T., Inoue, Y., Shikimachi, K., Hirano, N., Nagaya, S.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier B.V 01.11.2011
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:► A fracture toughness test method was developed for a YBCO coated conductor with an additional Cu layer. ► Mode I type tests were carried out using double cantilever beam (DCB) specimens. ► Delamination propagated into the YBCO layer, and sometimes reached the Ag/YBCO interface. ► The fracture toughness for YBCO was about 10J/m2. ► That for Ag/YBCO interface was about 100J/m2. Although interlaminar fracture at a YBa2Cu3O7−δ (YBCO)/CeO2 interface was reported for YBCO coated conductors, this has not yet been investigated by a fracture mechanical approach. In the present study, we developed a mode I type fracture toughness test method for a YBCO coated conductor with an additional Cu layer using double cantilever beam (DCB) specimens. Fracture mechanism was investigated by microscopic observation by a scanning electron microscope (SEM), together with composition analysis by an energy dispersive X-ray spectroscope (EDS). A pre-crack introduced at the YBCO/CeO2 interface deviated from the interface, and propagated into the YBCO layer, and sometimes reached the Ag/YBCO interface. The fracture toughness, GR, for YBCO and the Ag/YBCO interface was evaluated to be 7–10J/m2 and 80–120J/m2, respectively. The complex stress intensity factor ratio, K2/K1, at YBCO/CeO2 interface was evaluated to be −0.19, and this ratio controlled the formation of microcracks in the YBCO layer. The main crack propagated into the YBCO layer accompanied with the formation of microcracks.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0921-4534
1873-2143
DOI:10.1016/j.physc.2011.05.126