Histone expressions in mouse-rat somatic reconstituted cells

A critical analysis of histone expression was performed on the four interspecific and the two intraspecific reconstituted cells formed between karyoplast from mouse B 16 cells and the cytoplast from rat cells (L 6TG.CAP r) or mouse cells (B 82.CAP r). All the reconstituted cells had the same pattern...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inExperimental cell research Vol. 161; no. 1; pp. 141 - 149
Main Authors Ajiro, Kozo, Nishikawa, Yasuhiro, Tosu, Mariko, Sekiguchi, Toyozo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Orlando, FL Elsevier Inc 01.11.1985
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:A critical analysis of histone expression was performed on the four interspecific and the two intraspecific reconstituted cells formed between karyoplast from mouse B 16 cells and the cytoplast from rat cells (L 6TG.CAP r) or mouse cells (B 82.CAP r). All the reconstituted cells had the same pattern of mouse histones and the same amount of mouse-specific H2B. 2 histone as that of mouse nuclear donor cells. A hybrid between B 16 and L 6TG.CAP r contained both mouse and rat-specific H1b sybtypes, whereas no rat-specific H1b was detected in the interspecific reconstituted cells. In both intra- and interspecific reconstituted cells, the proportion of H1b content was lower than that of B 6 cells but that of H1∘ was higher, indicating that the mouse H1 patterns from these cells slightly resembled the pattern of slower growing and differentiated cytoplast donor cells. As an effect of the tumor promoter, the H1 pattern tended to revert to that of the nuclear donor cells in agreement with the phenotypic reversion, without any significant change in cell growth.
ISSN:0014-4827
1090-2422
DOI:10.1016/0014-4827(85)90498-7