Prevalence of Dental Anomalies in Patients with Nonsyndromic Cleft Lip and/or Palate in a Brazilian Population

• Published in: The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal Vol. 50; no. 4; pp. 400 - 405
• Main Authors: Paranaiba, Lívia Máris Ribeiro, Coletta, Ricardo D., Swerts, Mário Sérgio Oliveira, Quintino, Rafaela Pacífico, De Barros, Letízia Monteiro, Martelli-Júnior, Hercílio
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 01.07.2013; SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC
• Subjects: Cleft Lip - epidemiology; Cleft Palate - epidemiology; Deformities; Dentistry; Humans; Orthodontics; Prevalence; Retrospective Studies; Studies; Teeth; Tooth Abnormalities - epidemiology; Brazil; tooth agenesis; dental treatment; cleft lip and palate; dental anomaly
• ISSN: 1055-6656; 1545-1569
• DOI: 10.1597/11-029

Objective Many studies have demonstrated a high frequency of dental anomalies in patients with cleft lip and/or palate. Because dental anomalies may complicate dental treatment, we investigated the prevalence of dental anomalies in a group of Brazilian patients with nonsyndromic cleft lip and/or palate. Design, Participants, Setting Retrospective analysis was performed using clinical records of 296 patients aged between 12 and 30 years with repaired nonsyndromic cleft lip and/or palate without history of tooth extraction and orthodontic treatment. Associations between oral clefts and presence of dental anomalies outside the cleft area were investigated. Results Dental anomalies were identified in 39.9% of the nonsyndromic cleft lip and/or palate patients, and tooth agenesis (47.5%), impacted tooth (13.1%), and microdontia (12.7%) were the most common anomalies. Cleft lip patients were less affected by dental anomalies compared with cleft palate or cleft lip and palate patients (p = .057). Specifically, patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate were significantly more affected by dental anomalies than those with bilateral cleft lip and palate (p = .00002), and individuals with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate (p = .002) and complete cleft palate (p = .01) were significantly more affected by tooth agenesis than other cleft types. Agenesis of the premolars (p = .043) and maxillary lateral incisors (p = .03) were significantly more frequent in patients with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate. Conclusions The present study revealed a high frequency of dental anomalies in nonsyndromic cleft lip and/or palate patients and further demonstrated that patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate were frequently more affected by dental anomalies than those with bilateral cleft lip and palate. Moreover, our results demonstrate that dental anomalies should be considered during dental treatment planning for individuals affected by nonsyndromic cleft lip and/or palate.