Intramedullary Nailing of Open Tibial Fractures: Provisional Plate Fixation

• Published in: Orthopedics (Thorofare, N.J.) Vol. 39; no. 5; pp. e931 - e936
• Main Authors: Ludwig, Meryl, Hymes, Robert A, Schulman, Jeff, Pitta, Michael, Ramsey, Lolita
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States SLACK INCORPORATED 01.09.2016
• Subjects: Adult; Age; Body mass index; Bone Nails; Bone Plates; Classification; Confounding (Statistics); Debridement; Diabetes; Female; Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - instrumentation; Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - methods; Fractures, Open - surgery; Humans; Infections; Injuries; Male; Open fractures; Orthopedics; Patients; Postoperative Complications - etiology; Prosthesis-Related Infections - etiology; Regression analysis; Retrospective Studies; Statistical analysis; Tibial Fractures - surgery; Trauma; Treatment Outcome
• ISSN: 0147-7447; 1938-2367
• DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20160623-08

Tibia fracture is the most common type of long bone fracture, and intramedullary nailing is the preferred treatment. In open fractures, a provisional plate is often used to maintain reduction. It is unknown whether this practice increases the risk of infection or other complications. This study retrospectively compared patients who were treated at a level 1 trauma center with intramedullary nailing of an open tibia fracture. Patients who were included: (1) were 18 years or older; (2) were treated between January 1, 2005, and June 30, 2013; (3) had an open fracture of the tibia; and (4) were treated operatively with intramedullary nailing, with or without provisional plate fixation. Patient sex, history of diabetes, history of smoking, mechanism of injury, and side of injury were analyzed. Postoperative complications included infection, delayed union or non-union, compartment syndrome, and death. After the authors controlled for age, Gustilo-Anderson type, and AO/Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification, they found that provisional plate use did not significantly increase the risk of infection (adjusted odds ratio, 1.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.51-5.32; P=.41) or any other complications (adjusted odds ratio, 1.24; 95% confidence interval, 0.46-3.35; P=.67). In the subgroup of patients who had a provisional plate (n=35), removal of the plate did not significantly decrease the risk of infection (adjusted odds ratio, 0.43; 95% confidence interval, 0.07-2.69; P=.36) or other complications (adjusted odds ratio, 0.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.12-2.46; P=.44). In open tibia fractures treated with intramedullary nailing, provisional plate stabilization, a valuable reduction aid, did not increase the risk of infection or other complications. Because of the small subgroup size, however, definitive conclusions cannot be drawn about removal of these provisional plates. [Orthopedics. 2016; 39(5):e931-e936.].