Multirater and Gender Differences in the Measurement of Political Skill in Organizations

• Published in: Journal of leadership studies (Hoboken, N.J.) Vol. 7; no. 1; pp. 6 - 17
• Main Authors: Westbrook, Thomas S., Veale, James R., Karnes, Roger E.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Hoboken Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 01.03.2013; Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
• Subjects: Gender differences; Leadership; Organization theory; Politics; Skills; Studies
• ISSN: 1935-2611; 1935-262X
• DOI: 10.1002/jls.21275

Organizational political skill is an essential component of a leader's success. The purpose of the current study was to ascertain whether differences existed in how individuals rated themselves and were rated by others on 13 political skills using the Brandon Partners and Seldman Learning Organizational Savvy Multi‐Rater Assessment. Over 4,500 individuals completed an online self‐rater assessment to test the reliability and validity of the instrument. A sample of 131 individuals with 1,056 observer ratings completed an online multirater assessment to address the research questions. The dependent variables were the 13 political skill set average scores and the independent variables included gender and rater group. Significant rater group differences in multirater assessment of political acumen were found in all skill sets. The greatest difference was between the self‐ratings, always the lowest, and the ratings of the four rater groups. No significant gender differences in self‐assessment of organizational political skill were found in the 13 skill sets. Significant gender differences in ratings by others were found with females scoring higher than males in two areas. The findings contribute to our understanding of gender differences regarding the perception of political skill. Organizations can use this knowledge in educational programs to elevate leader performance.